Is Wall Street Making the Same Mistake Twice?

Jason Williams

Posted July 17, 2026

Not long ago, investors couldn’t get enough of SpaceX…

The company went public amid tremendous excitement, fueled by its dominance in commercial spaceflight, the explosive growth of Starlink, and the belief that Elon Musk’s most ambitious company could become even more transformative than Tesla.

Then reality set in and shares slipped below their IPO price.

Almost immediately, the critics emerged…

The valuation was ridiculous, they said. The excitement had gotten ahead of the fundamentals. Gravity had finally caught up with the stock.

Now, if all of that sounds familiar, it should. Because you’ve seen this movie before…

Back in 2020, Palantir entered the public markets facing many of the same criticisms.

Analysts argued the company’s valuation was detached from reality.

They questioned whether its addressable market could ever justify its price.

Some viewed it as little more than a niche government contractor masquerading as a high-growth software company.

And when Palantir’s shares eventually fell below their direct listing reference price, many of those same critics declared victory.

To them, the decline confirmed everything they had been saying from the beginning…

The company was overhyped. The valuation was absurd. The market had finally come to its senses.

But today, with the benefit of hindsight, those victory laps look pretty premature.

Palantir has since become one of the market’s biggest winners, up more than 20x from its post-IPO lows.

It’s been rewarding patient shareholders while forcing many early skeptics to rethink what the business was actually becoming.

Now, that doesn’t mean SpaceX will follow the same path. But it does raise an important question…

Is Wall Street once again judging a revolutionary business by the wrong set of assumptions?

Wall Street’s Blind Spot

Traditional valuation models work remarkably well for traditional companies.

Banks lend money. Utilities generate electricity. Manufacturers build products. Retailers sell merchandise.

And analysts understand these businesses because they’ve existed for decades.

Future cash flows can be estimated with reasonable confidence, competitors are well understood, and addressable markets are relatively easy to define.

The problem comes when a company creates an entirely new market.

You see, history shows that Wall Street often struggles to recognize businesses that don’t fit neatly into existing categories.

Amazon wasn’t simply an online bookstore. Netflix wasn’t just a DVD-by-mail company.

Tesla wasn’t merely another automaker. Palantir wasn’t simply an enterprise software vendor.

And perhaps most importantly for today’s investors…

SpaceX isn’t just a rocket company.

The Phase One Trap

One of the biggest mistakes investors make is assuming a company’s first successful business is also its final business.

Think back to Amazon’s early years…

Analysts valued book sales because that’s what they could measure.

But few imagined the company would eventually dominate cloud computing, digital advertising, streaming, logistics, artificial intelligence, and countless other industries.

The same thing happened with Palantir…

Many investors saw a business built around government contracts.

What they failed to appreciate was that those government relationships were funding something much larger…

An operating system for data, artificial intelligence, and enterprise decision-making.

As AI became mainstream, investors suddenly realized Palantir’s addressable market had expanded dramatically.

The business hadn’t changed overnight. But the market’s understanding of the business had.

And I believe SpaceX may be experiencing a similar disconnect…

Because many analysts continue to value SpaceX primarily as a launch provider with a rapidly growing satellite internet business.

And those are certainly important businesses. But they may also be just the beginning…

SpaceX Isn’t Selling Rockets

Rockets are simply the first product. What SpaceX is really building is infrastructure.

The railroad wasn’t valuable because it owned trains. It was valuable because it connected an entire continent.

Fiber optic cable wasn’t valuable because of the glass buried underground. It was valuable because it enabled the modern internet.

Likewise, reusable rockets are important not because launching satellites is a profitable niche business, but because they dramatically reduce the cost of reaching orbit.

Lower costs create new markets. And markets that barely existed a decade ago suddenly become economically viable.

Today, SpaceX already dominates commercial launch services while operating the world’s largest satellite internet constellation through Starlink.

Tomorrow, those capabilities could support an ecosystem that extends far beyond either business.

Orbital data centers powering artificial intelligence. Military logistics and communications. Missile defense infrastructure. Lunar transportation. In-space manufacturing. Satellite servicing. Orbital fuel depots. Resource development beyond Earth…

Not every one of those markets will become reality. Some may prove smaller than enthusiasts expect. And others may never materialize at all.

But that isn’t really the point…

The point is that it’s extraordinarily difficult to build a valuation model around industries that barely exist.

The Difference Between Price and Value

One of the most dangerous habits in investing is confusing a falling stock price with a failing business.

They’re not the same thing…

When Palantir fell below its listing price, many investors interpreted the decline as proof the company had been wildly overvalued.

Instead, history suggests the market simply hadn’t fully understood what Palantir was becoming.

Today, many investors appear to be making a similar assumption about SpaceX.

The recent decline below its IPO price has encouraged a fresh round of criticism.

And perhaps those critics are right. Perhaps today’s valuation really is too ambitious.

No one knows with certainty.

But history suggests investors should be cautious about declaring victory after only a few weeks or months of trading.

Markets frequently underestimate companies that are building entirely new industries because there are few historical comparisons to guide traditional valuation models.

That’s exactly what makes these businesses so difficult to own. But it’s also what occasionally makes them so rewarding for their owners.

Looking Beyond Today’s Business

The biggest investment opportunities rarely look obvious. If they did, they wouldn’t remain opportunities for very long.

Instead, they often look confusing. They appear expensive. Their valuations seem impossible to justify using conventional methods.

And most importantly, they’re building businesses that don’t fit comfortably into yesterday’s categories.

Palantir eventually forced Wall Street to acknowledge it wasn’t simply another software company.

The question facing investors today is whether SpaceX is simply another aerospace company, or whether it’s laying the foundation for an entirely new economic frontier.

The bears celebrating today’s weakness may ultimately be proven right.

Or history may remember this moment the same way it remembers those early victory laps taken after Palantir traded below its listing price.

Time will decide.

But investors would be wise to remember that Wall Street has a long history of valuing tomorrow’s companies using yesterday’s spreadsheets.

And sometimes, that’s exactly where the greatest opportunities are born.

Three More Opportunities Wall Street May Be Missing

Whether SpaceX ultimately becomes the next great long-term investment remains to be seen.

But one thing is becoming increasingly clear…

The industries that will define the coming decades, from artificial intelligence and advanced defense to commercial space and next-generation infrastructure, are being built right now.

The companies building that future won’t all be household names.

In fact, history suggests many of the biggest winners begin their journey while Wall Street is still struggling to understand what they actually do.

That’s why my colleague recently put together a special report highlighting three other companies helping build this new economy.

These are businesses he, too, believes the market may be misunderstanding for many of the same reasons investors once misunderstood companies like Palantir.

And for a limited time, we’re making this research available for free to Wealth Daily readers.

So if you’d like to discover three companies that could benefit from the same powerful trends reshaping artificial intelligence, defense, and the emerging space economy, click here to claim your complimentary copy before this limited-time offer expires.

The next generation of market leaders may already be taking shape. The only question is whether Wall Street recognizes them before everyone else does.

To your wealth,

jason-williams-signature-transparent

Jason Williams

follow basic @TheReal_JayDubs

follow basic Angel Research on Youtube

After graduating Cum Laude in finance and economics, Jason designed and analyzed complex projects for the U.S. Army. He made the jump to the private sector as an investment banking analyst at Morgan Stanley, where he eventually led his own team responsible for billions of dollars in daily trading. Jason left Wall Street to found his own investment office and now shares the strategies he used and the network he built with you. Jason is the founder of Main Street Ventures, a pre-IPO investment newsletter; the founder of Future Giants, a nano cap investing service; and authors The Wealth Advisory income stock newsletter. He is also the managing editor of Wealth Daily. To learn more about Jason, click here.

Want to hear more from Jason? Sign up to receive emails directly from him ranging from market commentaries to opportunities that he has his eye on. 

Angel Publishing Investor Club Discord - Chat Now

Jason Williams Premium

Introductory

Advanced